Autoimmunity in Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
Regulatory T-Cells and Immune Tolerance in MS
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronically progressive, neuroinflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS). It is driven in part by CD4+ T-cells that escape normal regulation and attack myelin protein peptides.
CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are a subset of suppressor T-cells. Their job is to maintain peripheral immune tolerance by actively suppressing auto-aggressive T-cells. Patients with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) have normal Treg function. But patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) have Tregs that don’t work properly. This loss of regulatory control allows pathogenic CD4 T-cells to infiltrate the CNS and drive neuroinflammation.
RRMS patients have both lower Treg numbers and impaired Treg function. Yet earlier studies found no link between treatment response and Treg numbers. Data from autoimmune animal models suggest a different explanation: resistance of pathogenic CD4+ effector T cells (Teffs) to Treg suppression may be what causes tolerance to fail in autoimmunity. This same Teff resistance has also been reported in human autoimmune diseases like type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and psoriasis. Several factors can trigger Teff resistance, including tumor necrosis factor–α (TNF-α), interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-12, IL-6, IL-7, IL-15, IL-21, and the maturation state of CD4 T-cells.
IL-6 and T-Effector Cell Resistance
In a study published in Nature, Schneider’s group showed that individuals with aggressive RRMS display Teff resistance. They also identified the role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in driving that resistance to Treg suppression.
Earlier research had already linked IL-6 to MS pathology. IL-6 inhibits apoptosis in T-cells, is required for T-helper 17 (TH17) cell differentiation, and can make Teffs resistant to suppression after local exposure. During an inflammatory immune response, IL-6 levels rise quickly and bind to the IL-6 receptor α (IL-6Rα) on the surface of CD4 T-cells. This recruits Glycoprotein 130 (gp130) to the IL-6-IL-6R complex, activating and phosphorylating signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). IL-6 can also bind soluble IL-6Rα (sIL-6Rα) in the serum, triggering STAT3 phosphorylation through membrane-bound gp130 instead. Genetic variants in the STAT3 locus are already linked to MS susceptibility. RRMS patients also show a significant rise in phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) and IL-6Rα expression on CD4+ T cells.
What the Study Found
Schneider’s team investigated Teff resistance in RRMS by comparing Teffs from RRMS patients and healthy individuals using Treg suppression assays. Teff resistance appeared only in patients with active disease (two or more clinical exacerbations, or one or more gadolinium-enhancing lesions on MRI within 2 years of sampling) — not in patients with inactive or mild disease.
When they ran suppression assays with a STAT3 inhibitor (blocking STAT3 phosphorylation), suppression improved. This points to a direct link between Teff resistance and increased pSTAT3 in response to IL-6. The data suggest that higher IL-6Rα expression on CD4+ T-cells, combined with IL-6-driven STAT3 phosphorylation, are major drivers of the impaired suppression seen in RRMS patients. The researchers hypothesize that in active RRMS, elevated IL-6 production from microglia, astrocytes, endothelial cells, neurons, oligodendrocytes, or infiltrating T-cells in the CNS drives both the pSTAT3 increase and the resistance to Treg regulation.
Implications for MS Research and Treatment
These findings suggest IL-6Rα expression and IL-6-mediated pSTAT3 could serve as new markers for tracking disease activity and treatment response — including response to immunomodulatory therapies like tocilizumab (an IL-6Rα antagonist) in RRMS. The study also used some unconventional technical approaches: testing IL-6’s impact on suppression in an antigen-presenting cell (APC)-free system, and using a bead-based stimulation assay plus in vitro-generated Tregs to keep activation and Treg source consistent. These techniques were key to the study’s conclusions and should prove useful for future MS research.
Sanguine supplies research-grade human CD4+ T cells for studies like this.
Further Reading: